Timbuktu became part of the Mali Empire. The Mail Empire produced
one pilgrimage which was itself a symbol of “God, gold and
glory.” Mali Emperor Mansa Moussa decided to go on a pilgrimage
to Mecca in a huge caravan of “God, gold and glory.” The trip to
Mecca was overland through Cairo. Mansa Moussa is reported to
have arrived in Cairo with an entourage of 60,000 people, 80
camels carrying over two tons of gold for distribution to the poor
and the pious. Mansa Moussa was so lavish in his generosity in
Egypt that the value of gold almost collapsed on the Egyptian gold
market.
When in
our own times the second millennium was coming to an end in the
year 1999, Life magazine included Mansa Moussa’s pilgrimage
to Mecca in the fourteenth century among the great events of the
whole millennium – a remarkable celebration indeed of “God, gold
and glory.”
Mansa
Moussa’s pilgrimage was a matter of recorded history. But there
is an element about the Mali Empire which is a matter more of
historical speculation than of historical confirmation. Did
Abubakari II of Mali [Emperor Bakari II] launch a fleet to cross
the Atlantic generations before Christopher Columbus traversed the
ocean blue in 1492? Did the Emprie which produced the glories of
Timbuktu also produce the glories of a Black trans-Atlantic
crossing long before Christopher Columbus? This latter claim is
more hotly debated than Mansa Moussa’s trans-Saharan odyssey. But
both have entered the grand legends of the Black Experience.
There
is a third huge topic which touches upon the historical
interaction between the people of the southern margins of the
Sahara like Mali and Niger and those of northern Sahara like
Moroccans, Tunisians and Egyptians. Are we to trace the origins
of the name “Africa” to the historic interaction between so-called
Berber people of northern Sahara and the trans-Saharan Tuareg all
the way to Mali?
What is
clear is that the name “Africa” was first applied only to North
Africa and the term, “Blacklands” (Arabic “Sudan”)
was first applied to Mali. Timbuktu’s interaction with Morocco,
Tunisia and Egypt might gradually have helped to create the name
of our continent, “Africa.”
Another
major connection we need to associate with Timbuktu is the link
between religion and science. In the African context, the
scholars of ancient Timbuktu were among the first to synthesize
the twin studies of religion and science. A similar trend was
occurring in the West at the same time.
In the
history of universities within the second Christian millennium
there was often a link between religion and science. For several
centuries at the University of Oxford, England, one could not hold
an academic position without subscribing to the articles of faith
of the Church of England. One could not get a Masters degree
either without that religious reaffirmation.
In the
context of the millennium, Oxford University is the oldest
university in the English-speaking world and one of the oldest in
the Western world. Harvard is less than half a millennium old.
Harvard College was a church-sponsored school for two centuries,
and it was named after a Puritan Minister in about 1638. The
problem at Harvard at that time was not Eurocentrism but
Christocentrism. Harvard was not only exclusive by class
but also exclusive by religion.
There
are two methods for a religious school to go beyond being purely
religious – one is through a strategy of secularization and
the other is through a strategy of dualization.
Secularization is the route which Harvard (and Oxford) took as the
subject-matter, the methods of study, and the qualifications for
entry and graduation became more and more religion-neutral.
Dualization is the strategy which Timbuktu and Al-Azhar University
took as each evolved into a dual university – one part still
religious and basically sacred and the other part of Timbuktu and
Al-Azhar as secular and modern.
But
neither the secularization of Oxford and Harvard nor the
dualization of Al-Azhar and Timbuktu happened at once. There were
stages on the way. For example, while Harvard was secularizing
the subject-matter being studied within its walls, it was still
discriminating on religious grounds in its admissions policy.
The
policies of the quota system at American universities for
centuries were intentionally designed to restrict the number of
Jews admitted, in favor of Christians. Christocentrism applied to
admission. There is still a lot of Christocentrism left at many
American universities, but most of university life has been
increasingly secularized in the last quarter-millennium.
Occasionally there is Judeo-Christocentrism
at American universities. When I started teaching at the State
University of New York at Binghamton in 1989, and I offered to
teach a course on Islam in World Affairs, the chairman of my
department said, “Do you realize, Professor Mazrui, that this is a
Jewish university?” I responded, “Is that an argument for, or
against, teaching a course on Islam in world affairs?” And he
said, “The real problem is that your coming here was accompanied
by a good deal of controversy. It would be inadvisable to be
teaching a course in your first semester about a controversial
subject.” In the end we compromised by my teaching such a course
on Islam in my second semester after arrival, rather than the
first. Since then Jewish students have demonstrated a healthy
interest in classes on Islam.
Of course U.S. universities have since
become increasingly secular and scientific institutions – though
within the wider diversity of American academia there are still
faith-based universities like Notre Dame (Catholic in
orientation), Brandeis (Jewish in orientation) and others. But
even these are at their best academic vanguards of science rather
than asylums of religion.
U.S. Muslims have also begun
establishing institutions of higher learning of their own –
including this Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences [GSIS]
located near Washington, D.C..
GSIS is not very far from Georgetown
University in Washington, which has its own Center for
Muslim-Christian Understanding led for a long time by Professor
John Esposito, a Roman Catholic scholar of Islam and a friend of
U.S. Muslims.
Elsewhere in major universities in the
United States Islam is also studied. A major complaint of U.S.
Muslims is that most centers of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies
on the main campuses are either led or dominated by Jewish
scholars. However, although there are as many Muslims as Jews in
the U.S. today, there are many more Jewish scholars than
Muslim scholars.
Have African universities also
experienced the dialectic of sacred science? In Arab Africa
universities go further back than not only universities in the
United States but further back than in Europe. Al-Azhar
University in Cairo is, as we indicated, over a thousand years old
– older than any existing university in the Western world.
Morocco can boast a comparable ancient institution of higher
learning still in existence today in Fez [Qarawiyin].
The history of Islamic civilization as
a whole was indeed once a fusion of religious vision and
scientific advancement. Timbuktu was part of this vanguard. We
must not forget that words like algebra, zero, tariff, are of
Arabic derivation. And the numerals we use are still called
Arabic numerals – though they are partly also Indian. Religion
and science were also once linked in the academy in Timbuktu in
ancient times. Timbuktu was using the Arabic numerals long before
this hemisphere knew how to write down the numerals 1492 or 1776.
The scholarly foundations of classical Timbuktu continued to be
the dual legacy of Africanity and Islam.
Conclusion
We have mentioned Timbuktu’s
relationship with North Africa. One of Africa’s greatest
travelers was Ibn Battuta (1304 to 1368), who testified to the
scholarship of Timbuktu. North Africa had earlier contributed to
Christian thought through the scholar St. Augustine of Hippo. St.
Augustine was one of the most brilliant theologians in the history
of Christianity.
North Africa has
also contributed to global scholarship the Tunisian Ibn Khaldun,
after whom a number of Chairs in the United States have been
named. Ibu Khaldun was stimulated by Timbuktu. American
University in Washington, D.C. currently has an Ibn Khaldun Chair.
In December 1999
the BBC Programme asked me to choose the two greatest Africans of
the Millennium. For the man of the pen I chose Ibn Khaldun;
for the man of action I chose Shaka Zulu. A North African
name of compelling intellectual relevance is Ibn Khaldun
who was born in Tunis in 1332. From 1375 he spent 4 years writing
Al Muqaddimah, his philosophy of history. Arnold Toynbee,
the distinguished Western macro-historian, described Ibn Khaldun’s
work as “a philosophy of history which
is undoubtedly the greatest work of its kind that has ever yet
been created by any mind in any time or place.”
Robert Flint,
another historian of thought, described Ibn Khaldun as follows:
“As a theorist of history he had no equal in
any age or country until Vico appeared, more than three hundred
years later. Plato, Aristotle and Augustine were not his peers...”
A
partial translation of the Al-Muqaddimah was translated
into Turkish in the 18th century. But it was not until
a complete French translation of Al-Muqaddimah appeared in
the 1860s that Ibn Khaldun would claim world audience and
recognition of his remarkable genius.
The
interaction between North Africa and West Africa stimulated not
just awareness of God and the pursuit of gold. It
also stimulated the glories of the mind. These were not just
moments in history. They were advances for all time. Timbuktu is
part of this grand panorama of human achievement;. The dual
legacy of Africanity and Islam turned classical Timbuktu into a
remarkable triumph of cultural synthesis, a meeting point of
civilizations.